Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 576 SO2D 1234 - Revolta v. Barbe

Revolta v. Barbe’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 1999
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Canter v. Koehring Company · 507 So. 2d 825 - Virgil v. American Guar. & Liability Ins. · Pazereckis v. Thornhill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Louisiana's ... court system allocates the fact finding function to the trial courts. Because of that allocation of function (as well as the trial court's normal procedure of evaluating live witnesses), great deference is accorded to the trial judge's factual findings, both express and implicit, and reasonable inferences of fact should not be disturbed on appellate review of the trial court's judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.