Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

576 So. 2d 1375

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1991-04-04

Relies on 544 So. 2d 1004 - Wood v. State · Harriel v. State · Hicks v. State

Decided 1991-04-04

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the conviction and sentence in this case except that we reverse and strike the order requiring restitution because the record shows the theft victim recovered the stolen television and we reverse and strike the award of court costs imposed without notice and hearing. See Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (Fla.1989); Harriel v. State, 520 So.2d 271 (Fla.1988); Burgess v. State, 569 So.2d 829 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); McMahon v. State, 561 So.2d 1284 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Clark v. State, 560 So.2d 264 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).

¶2AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

COWART, GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.
/576/so2d/1375 · .json · Public domain