Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

576 So. 2d 1378

Docket No. 90-02000.

MRG v. State

M.R.G., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1991-04-05

Relies on 350 So. 2d 462 - Delap v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1991-04-05

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 2010

7 state decisions

40199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Peggy A. Quince, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Appellant M.R.G. seeks review of a circuit court order adjudicating him delinquent and placing him on supervised community control. It is undisputed that, through no fault of appellant, a transcript of the adjudicatory hearing cannot be obtained nor can an adequate record be reconstructed. Accordingly we have no alternative but to remand this case to the circuit court with instructions to conduct a de novo hearing. Delap v. State,350 So.2d 462 (Fla. 1977).

¶5We disagree with the state's contention that this matter has become moot due to the fact appellant's term of community control has expired.

¶6Reversed.

¶7SCHOONOVER, C.J., and CAMPBELL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

/576/so2d/1378 · .json · Public domain