Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 576 SO2D 278 - Burr v. State

Burr v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2019

13 state decisions

50199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lockett v. Ohio · Dowling v. United States · 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · Rodriguez v. New York · Hitchcock v. Dugger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is inconsistent with the notions of fair trial for the state to force a defendant to resurrect a prior defense against a crime for which he is not on trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “'that if the Williams Rules testimony admitted during this trial is found to have been improperly admitted then the sentence I impose today will be academic.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “Perkins rests entirely on Florida Law. Art. I, § 9, Fla. Const. [due process/double jeopardy].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.