¶1Affirmed. Khelifi v. State, 560 So.2d 333 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). We distinguish State v, Anders, 560 So.2d 288 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) and Hunter v. State, 531 So.2d 239 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988) because in both cases the informant’s testimony was the key evidence regarding the drug transaction in which appellant was arrested. However, in the instant case, the appellant negotiated directly with the officers regarding the details of the transaction, all of whom testified against appellant. The informant’s testimony was not the vital part of the state’s case.
576 So. 2d 349
Jamarillo v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 27, 1991
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1991-02-27
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1991
2 state decisions
Relies on Hunter v. State · State v. Anders · Khelifi v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1991-02-27
View the full empirical analysis of this case →