Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

576 So. 2d 434

576 So.2d 434

16 Fla.L.Weekly 777

Walker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1991-03-22

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 2000

4 state decisions

Relies on Walker v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1991-03-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the appellant's convictions but reverse the appellant’s habitual offender sentence and remand for resentencing. In order to be sentenced as a habitual offender under section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1988), a defendant must have successive felony convictions. The appellant’s two prior convictions were rendered on the same date, and so they should have been treated as a single offense. Walker v. State, 567 So.2d 546 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

¶2Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.
/576/so2d/434 · .json · Public domain