Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

576 So. 2d 705

576 So.2d 705

16 Fla.L.WeeklySupp. 117

Florida Bar re Kay

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1991

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1991-01-15

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1995

1 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“Because Kay resigned prior to the adoption of rule 3-7.9(a) of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar, we permitted him to file for readmission with this Court and appointed a referee to make recommendations. Henceforth, all applications for readmission shall be filed pursuant to rule 3-7.9(a).”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 657 So. 2d 1143 - In re Holober

Relies on Williams v. Board of Governors of Florida Bar · 464 So. 2d 1200 - Florida Bar v. Kay

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1991-01-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Ronald E. Kay petitions for readmission to active membership in The Florida Bar after having resigned in 1985 pending disciplinary proceedings involving his convictions on two felony counts,* We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. The present proceeding is before the Court on the report of a referee, who found that Kay had demonstrated his rehabilitation and recommended that this Court grant readmission. The Florida Bar seeks review of the referee’s findings of fact, arguing that the record establishes that the petitioner has significant psychological problems and that his readmission would be a danger to the public. We agree and find that readmission should not be granted.

¶2The referee recognized that Kay has substantial psychological problems and recommended that Kay

obtain psychological or psychiatric counseling. Said counseling shall be on a minimum of a one (1) hour per week basis for a period of one (1) year and thereafter until motion is made to the Supreme Court of Florida for release from counseling and an Order of Determination entered by the Supreme Court of Florida.

¶3This record reflects that Kay’s present psychological difficulties existed previously and contributed to the past criminal misconduct for which he resigned. We find that on this record it is in the public’s best interest to deny readmittance at this time. Williams v. Board of Governors, 173 So.2d 686 (Fla.1965).

¶4Accordingly, the recommendation of the referee is disapproved. Judgment for costs in the amount of $5,238.75 is hereby entered against Ronald E. Kay, for which sum let execution issue.

¶5It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J., OVERTON, McDONALD, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., and EHRLICH, Senior Justice, concur.

¶6The Fla. Bar v. Kay, 464 So.2d 1200 (Fla.1985). Because Kay resigned prior to the adoption of rule 3-7.9(a) of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar, we permitted him to file for readmission with this Court and appointed a referee to make recommendations. Henceforth, all applications for readmission shall be filed pursuant to rule 3-7.9(a).

/576/so2d/705 · .json · Public domain