Seger v. Camp’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently November 2001
2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3182
Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · Gerstein v. Pugh · Giordenello v. United States · Jaben v. United States · Oliver Lee Kirkland and Elizabeth Smith v. Paul H. Preston and Luke Moore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) that the person is demanded as a fugitive from justice; (2) that there is an indictment or affidavit produced charging the person demanded with having committed a crime; and, (3) that the papers have been certified as authentic by the demanding state.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“accompanied by [an authenticated] copy of the indictment found or by [an authenticated] information supported by affidavit made before [a] ... judge there, together with a copy of any warrant which was issued thereupon.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. White v. Armontrout“that the accused was present in the demanding state at the time of the commission of the alleged crime, and that thereafter he fled from the state,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. White v. Armontrout
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.