King v. Burwell’s Empirical Analysis
576 U.S. 473 · 2015
Citation profile
1 district · 10 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 125 · 26 U.S.C. § 24 · 26 U.S.C. § 36B · 26 U.S.C. § 5000A · 26 U.S.C. § 6055 · 42 U.S.C. § 1396C (§ 1904 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396w-3 · 42 U.S.C. § 18024
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · William Marbury v. James Madison · United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd. · Lamie v. United States Trustee · Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“fundamental canon of statutory construction that the words of a statute must be read in their context and with a view to their place in the overall statutory scheme.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Rather than rewriting the law under the pretense of interpreting it,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.