Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 577 F.2d 1247 - United States v. Clemones

United States v. Clemones’s Empirical Analysis

577 F.2d 1247 · 1978

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
2
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently April 2013 · most notably United States v. Pepe (1984), United States v. Lemm (1982)

28 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

18019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 2421 (White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910 (Mann Act)) · 18 U.S.C. § 2422 (White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910 (Mann Act)) · 18 U.S.C. § 3731

Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · United States v. Scott · United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co. · Blumenthal v. United States · United States v. Feola

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a single-purpose and continuously ongoing undertaking to operate a multi-state prostitution enterprise,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “have not demonstrated real, substantive impairment of their right to a fair trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.