United States v. Echols’s Empirical Analysis
577 F.2d 308 · 1978
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably United States v. Mangieri (1982), United States v. Marx (1981)
17 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Freedman v. Maryland · Heller v. New York · United States v. Sellers · United States v. Sherwin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The sole issue presented is whether the federal agent could lawfully be present during the proper execution of that [state] warrant. This Court has previously answered this question in the affirmative, and we have emphasized that we do not in any way wish to discourage cooperation between federal and state law enforcement officers.” (e. s.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Maier“the federal agent’s presence was part of a calculated search for evidence of federal crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.