Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 577 F.2d 504 - Robert Warner Myers v. B. J. Rhay

Robert Warner Myers v. B. J. Rhay’s Empirical Analysis

577 F.2d 504 · 1978

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably Holleman v. Duckworth (1983), Terrovona v. Kincheloe (1990)

15 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

17019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · Wong Sun v. United States · Johnson v. Zerbst · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Coolidge v. New Hampshire

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This Circuit adheres to the well-established principle of Ker v. Illinois, [ 119 U.S. 436 , 7 S. Ct. 225 , 30 L. Ed. 421 (1886)], and Frisbie v. Collins, [ 342 U.S. 519 , 72 S. Ct. 509 , 96 L. Ed. 541 (1952)], that even the forcible return of a defendant to the jurisdiction in which he is tried is no bar to the prosecution of him once he is present in the forum state.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the failure to observe procedures adequate to protect a defendant's right not to be tried or convicted while incompetent to stand trial deprives him of his due process right to a fair trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.