Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 577 F.3d 1069 - United States v. Reyes

United States v. Reyes’s Empirical Analysis

577 F.3d 1069 · 2009

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently January 2020 · most notably United States v. Gordon (2013), Quan v. Computer Sciences Corp. (2010)

14 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

290200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78F (§ 6 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78M (§ 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on Burks v. United States · Berger v. United States · United States v. Young · Basic Inc. v. Levinson · TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is certainly within the bounds of fair advocacy for a prosecutor, like any lawyer, to ask the jury to draw inferences from the evidence that the prosecutor believes in good faith might be true. But it is decidedly improper for the government to propound inferences that it knows to be false, or has very strong reason to doubt, particularly when it refuses to acknowledge the error after-wards to either the trial court or this court and instead offers far-fetched explanations of its actions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the right to purchase a share of stock from a company at a fixed price, referred to as the ‘strike price,’ on or after a specified vesting date.” United States v. Reyes, 577 F.3d 1069 , 1073 (9th Cir.2009).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “make and keep books, records, and accounts which, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the issuer”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.