Matylinsky v. Budge’s Empirical Analysis
577 F.3d 1083 · 2009
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Palmer v. Hendricks (2010), Treesh v. Bagley (2010)
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Jackson v. Denno · Estelle v. McGuire · United States v. Cronic
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Strickland standard is applicable when a petitioner claims his attorney was ineffective by denying him his constitutional right to testify.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Thomas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.