Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 577 F.3d 1284 - Wilson v. Workman

Wilson v. Workman’s Empirical Analysis

577 F.3d 1284 · 2009

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
2
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably Archuleta v. Galetka (2011), State v. Timothy Alan Dunlap (2013)

23 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

380200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Williams v. Taylor · Coleman v. Thompson · Santosky v. Kramer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Accordingly, having thoroughly reviewed Appellant’s Application and accompanying affidavits, we find he has failed to show by clear and convincing evidence a strong possibility that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate further and utilize the complained-of evidence. We decline to grant Appellant’s application for an evi-dentiary hearing on sixth amendment [sic] grounds.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A claim is more than a mere theory on which a court could grant relief; a claim must have a factual basis, and an adjudication of that claim requires an evaluation of that factual basis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “on an incomplete record, it has not made an adjudication on the merits to which we owe any deference.” Id. at , 1291. But we also cautioned that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.