United States v. Ware’s Empirical Analysis
577 F.3d 442 · 2009
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2024 · most notably Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders (2011), Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders (2011)
9 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77Q (§ 17 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · United States v. Olano · Glasser v. United States · Johnson v. United States · Oregon v. Kennedy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we must view all of the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, crediting every inference that could have been drawn in the government’s favor. Where there are conflicts in the testimony, we must defer to the jury’s resolution of the weight of the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A court must ... make two specific factual findings before it can properly enhance a defendant's offense level under § 3B1.1(a): (i) that the defendant was `an organizer or leader,' and (ii) that the criminal activity ... `involved five or more participants' or `was otherwise extensive.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]n assessing whether an organization is ‘otherwise extensive,’ all persons involved during the course of the entire offense are to be considered. Thus, a fraud that involved only three participants but used the unknowing services of many outsiders could be considered extensive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.