Pueschel v. Peters’s Empirical Analysis
577 F.3d 558 · 2009
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably Dulaney v. Packaging Corp. of America (2012), News & Observer Publishing Co. v. Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority (2010)
10 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 791 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 7702 · 5 U.S.C. § 7703
Relies on Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. · Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson · Katz v. Dole · Williams v. Department of Army · Ocheltree v. Scollon Productions, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A federal employee who asserts both discrimination in violation of Title VII and an ‘adverse employment action’ asserts a ‘mixed case.' ” Pueschel v. Peters, 577 F.3d 558, 563 (4th Cir.2009). A plaintiff in a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.