United States v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
577 F.3d 660 · 2009
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Crawford v. Washington · General Electric Co. v. Joiner · United States v. Stone · United States v. Lloyd
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Instead, to constitute a Confrontation Clause violation, 'the statement must be used as hearsay — in other words, it must be offered for the truth of the matter asserted.’ ” United States v. Davis, 577 F.3d 660 , 670 (6th Cir.2009) (citations omitted); see Williams, 132 S.Ct. at 2228 (holding that an expert’s”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.