577 F. Supp. 2d 681 - In Re Optionable Securities Litigation’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78T (§ 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. · Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc. · ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A securities fraud complaint based on misstatements must (1) specify the statements that the plaintiff contends were fraudulent, (2) identify the speaker, (3) state where and when the statements were made, and (4) explain why the statements were fraudulent.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the corporation is subject to a duty to disclose the omitted facts.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“not required to disclose a fact merely because a reasonable investor would very much like to know that fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.