Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 577 P2D 698 - Ebona v. State

Ebona v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
5
states following
November 2011
most recently cited

1 district · 41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently November 2011 · most notably State v. Field (1993), Waring v. State (1983)

1 district · 41 state decisions

23019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Adams v. Williams · Blitz v. Boog · Cooksey v. State · Coleman v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “even on a relatively deserted street, poses a significant threat to property or individuals in proximity to the vehicle.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Matter of JA · Larson v. State
  2. “[T]he police officer must be able to point to specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant the intrusion.... And in making that assessment it is imperative that the facts be judged against an objective standard: would the facts available to the officer at the moment of the seizure or the search “warrant a man of reasonable caution in the belief” that the action taken was appropriate?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Larson v. State
  3. “a police officer with a reasonable suspicion that imminent public danger exists or that serious harm that has recently occurred was caused by a particular person may stop that person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Free v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.