Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 577 SO2D 1147 - Fay v. Willis

Fay v. Willis’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 1993
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Deane v. McGee · Graham v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa. · 433 So. 2d 1040 - Block v. Reliance Ins. Co. · Capone v. King · 393 So. 2d 703 - Courville v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “limit a person who is injured while occupying an owned automobile to the UM coverage, if any, on that automobile.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 619 So. 2d 111 - Jones v. Allstate Ins. Co.
  2. “was to cripple the selective right recognized in Wyatt”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 619 So. 2d 111 - Jones v. Allstate Ins. Co.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.