Thompson v. Hodge’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Arceneaux v. Domingue · 373 So. 2d 498 - Reck v. Stevens · Watson v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Ins. Co. · 455 So. 2d 1364 - Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“ANALYSISISSUES FIVE AND SIX We now turn to address whether the trial court erred in amending the jury's finding that the defendant was 60 percent at fault and the plaintiff was 40 percent at fault when there was a discrepancy between the jury's answers to the interrogatories and the general verdict and whether the trial court, upon granting the JNOV, erred in finding that the management of the apartment, Southmark, was 100 percent at fault for the rape of the plaintiff. We see the trial court's initial judgment, dated May 19, 1992, adopted the jury verdict as the final judgment, which reads: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the verdict of jury be the judgment of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that negligence against the plaintiff, Christi Veazey, be assessed at 40% and negligence against the defendant, Southmark Management Corporation[,] be assessed at 60%.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.