Goene v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 43 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably 823 So. 2d 757 - Hall v. State (2002), Trotter v. State (2002)
1 federal appellate · 43 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Burks v. United States · Green v. United States · United States v. DiFrancesco · Grady v. Corbin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Goene intentionally committed fraud upon by the court by falsely stating his identity. Knowing that the sentence originally imposed was lower than a sentence which would have been imposed had his true identity been revealed, because of the absence of his prior criminal history, Goene should have realized that if the falsity of his statements was revealed, his freedom would be affected by reimposition of a correct sentence. Goene therefore had no legitimate expectation of finality in the sentence originally imposed and there is no double jeopardy prohibition against reimposition of a correct sentence.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[Double jeopardy] protects against a second prosecution for the same offense after acquittal. It protects against a second prosecution for the same offense after conviction. And it protects against multiple punishments for the same offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“orders, judgments, or decrees which are the product of fraud, deceit, or collusion may be vacated, modified, opened or otherwise acted upon at any time”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Hon. Boyden
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.