Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably 731 So. 2d 1120 - Young v. State (1999), Cole v. State (1992)
38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Perma Research & Development Co. v. Singer Co. · 444 So. 2d 358 - Brown v. Credit Center, Inc. · Albertson v. Tj Stevenson & Company Inc · Neal v. State · 575 So. 2d 967 - FOSTER BY FOSTER v. Bass
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“where an affidavit is overwhelmingly belied by unimpeachable documentary evidence in the record such as, for example, a transcript or written statements of the affiant to the contrary to the extent that the court can conclude that the affidavit is a sham no hearing is required.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage“[D]isputes between lawyer and client over instructions to take or not to take an appeal are difficult to resolve without a record. Lawyers should assist the court in this regard by reducing decisions whether to appeal a criminal conviction to a writing signed by the defendant.... We also urge trial courts to advise criminal defendants of their rights concerning appeal on the record at the time of sentencing and to solicit a decision in that regard.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Harris v. State · Sellers v. State“[i]n order for a contested fact to require an evidentiary hearing it must be material.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.