577 So. 2d 474 - Kuenzel v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
235 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 238 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably 577 So. 2d 531 - Ex Parte Kuenzel (1991), 705 So. 2d 307 - Holland v. State (1997)
235 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · United States v. Young · Irvin v. Dowd · Wainwright v. Witt · Sandstrom v. Montana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 238 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`This court has concluded that the failure to object to improper prosecutorial arguments ... should be weighed as part of our evaluation of the claim on the merits because of its suggestion that the defense did not consider the comments in question to be particularly harmful.'”
50 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Townes v. State · Johnson v. State“"In all cases in which the death penalty has been imposed, the Court of Criminal Appeals shall notice any plain error or defect in the proceedings under review, whether or not brought to the attention of the trial court, and take appropriate appellate action by reason thereof, whenever such error has or probably has adversely affected the substantial right of the appellant."”
38 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Minor v. State · Knotts v. State“`the plain error exception to the contemporaneous-objection rule is to be "used sparingly, solely in those circumstances in which a miscarriage of justice would otherwise result.”
25 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Minor v. State · Dill v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.