577 So. 2d 535 - Sattari v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 2015
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Kotteakos v. United States · United States v. Young · Carnegie v. United States · United States v. Hasting
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The use of such tactics by representatives of the State can seriously affect the fairness, integrity, and public reputation of judicial proceedings. This type of rhetoric by prosecutors has 'no place in the administration of justice and should neither be permitted nor rewarded.' United States v. Young , 470 U.S. 1 , 26 , 105 S.Ct. 1038 , 1052 , 84 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985). Such behavior deserves 'stern and unqualified judicial condemnation.' Id. at 28 , 105 S.Ct. at 1052 ."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[S]uch expressions as 'I object' or 'we object' or 'objection' are not sufficient to constitute the 'specific objection' necessary to place the trial court in error for overruling an objection . . . [unless] the ground is so obvious, . . . or if the objected-to matter is clearly not proper for any purpose.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the prosecutor's comparisons of appellants, who [were] on trial for the charge of arson in the first degree, to a capital murderer [was] a completely unwarranted and disproportionate analogy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.