Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

577 So. 2d 722

Burney v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1991-04-12

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1993

1 state decisions

Relies on 559 So. 2d 411 - Marsh v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1991-04-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The appellant correctly contends that the trial court had no jurisdiction to hear the violation of probation proceeding after the expiration of the appellant’s original probationary term. Section 948.06, Florida Statutes (1987), provides the only means to extend probation, and “a probationer and his probation officer cannot make a valid agreement to extend probation in lieu of compliance with the statutory procedures.” Marsh v. State, 559 So.2d 411, 412 (Fla.2d DCA 1990). Thus, the judgment and sentence resulting from the revocation of probation are reversed and the appellant shall be discharged.

LEHAN, A.C.J., and FRANK and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.
/577/so2d/722 · .json · Public domain