¶1The appellant correctly contends that the trial court had no jurisdiction to hear the violation of probation proceeding after the expiration of the appellant’s original probationary term. Section 948.06, Florida Statutes (1987), provides the only means to extend probation, and “a probationer and his probation officer cannot make a valid agreement to extend probation in lieu of compliance with the statutory procedures.” Marsh v. State, 559 So.2d 411, 412 (Fla.2d DCA 1990). Thus, the judgment and sentence resulting from the revocation of probation are reversed and the appellant shall be discharged.
577 So. 2d 722
Burney v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 12, 1991
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1991-04-12
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1993
1 state decisions
Relies on 559 So. 2d 411 - Marsh v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1991-04-12
View the full empirical analysis of this case →