Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 577 S.W.2d 257 - Steinhauser v. State

Steinhauser v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
October 1986
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Burks v. United States · Greene v. Massey · Martinez v. State · Faulkner v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There is absolutely no evidence to show the appellant made the phone calls to the [complainant’s] household on the dates alleged .... Finally, the evidence presented by the State shows that there were people other than the appellant present at the household of H. H. Steinhauser where the originating phone for the anonymous phone calls were registered. The State has failed to connect the appellant with the actual calls allegedly made to [complainant] on the dates alleged.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.