In re Harrington’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 522
Relies on Butner v. United States · 134 S. Ct. 1188 - Law v. Siegel · Doan v. Hudgins · Cohen v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. · Ppx Enterprises Inc Jh v. Audiofidelity Inc J
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“However, there are three exceptions to the general rule: (i) parties cannot stipulate to facts that do not exist, (ii) a court is not bound by a stipulation that is manifestly unjust, or there is substantial evidence contrary to the stipulation and (iii) a court is not required to accept a stipulation regarding a question of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“apply the statutory formula by adding to the judicial lien under consideration: (i) all other liens encumbering Elm Street and Creal Road combined and (ii) the amount of the exemptions claimed as to both parcels.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“should first be fully chargeable in satisfying NBT's lien prior to any interest of [Harrington] being charged with that lien.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.