United States v. Holbert’s Empirical Analysis
578 F.2d 128 · 1978
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 2024
11 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2117 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 659
Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · United States v. Grunberger · United States v. Sutherland · United States v. Merrill · United States v. Wells
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the [defendant's] argument overlooks a long line of authority which recognizes that false exculpatory statements may be used not only to impeach, but also as substantive evidence tending to prove guilt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.