Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 578 F.2d 289 - Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s Empirical Analysis

578 F.2d 289 · 1978

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2019 · most notably Kisor v. Wilkie (2019), Edwards v. Califano (1980)

19 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

14019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 717 · 15 U.S.C. § 717A · 15 U.S.C. § 717F

Relies on Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co. · United States v. Larionoff · Federal Power Commission v. Texaco Inc. · Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hen the administrative interpretation is not based on expertise in the particular field ... but is based on general common law principles, great deference is not required.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “interpreting the word ‘purchase,’ [which was contained in his agency’s regulation,] the [Secretary] relied primarily on property concepts developed and enunciated by the common law;”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.