Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 578 F.2d 555 - Fredericks v. Kreps

Fredericks v. Kreps’s Empirical Analysis

578 F.2d 555 · 1978

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
April 2001
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 2001

13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

1201978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 6701 (Intergovernmental Antirecession Assistance Act of 1977) · 42 U.S.C. § 6705 · 42 U.S.C. § 6706 · 42 U.S.C. § 6707

Relies on Udall v. Tallman · Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc. · Trans Alaska Pipeline Rate Cases · Florida v. Mathews

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “reasonably related to the purposes of the enabling legislation,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Our determination that EDA's regulations are consistent with the intent of Congress is reinforced by the fact that Congressional oversight committees acquiesced in EDA's regulations and guidelines before they were put into effect. Hearings were held in May 1977, and the regulations and guidelines were allowed to become operative. That the careful review of these committees found the regulations and guidelines to be consistent with the congressional intent lends the firmest possible support to our conclusion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.