Jett v. Castaneda’s Empirical Analysis
578 F.2d 842 · 1978
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently January 2004 · most notably Toussaint v. McCarthy (1986), Commonwealth v. Chacko (1983)
22 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Escobedo v. Illinois · Mathis v. United States · United States v. Castaneda
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] district court has no general supervisory jurisdiction over the course of executive investigations.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“may be subject to a suit to enjoin egregiously illegal conduct.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The right to counsel during custodial interrogation implements the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. It does not proceed directly from the Sixth Amendment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Eben v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.