Randle v. Crawford’s Empirical Analysis
578 F.3d 1177 · 2009
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on State of New Hampshire v. State of Maine · Katuria E. Smith v. Tyson Marsh · Day v. McDonough · Jimenez v. Quarterman · Kevin Smith v. Michael McGinnis Superintendent, Southport Correctional Facility
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To facilitate Randle’s exhaustion of Ground II(A-N) in this case, undersigned counsel respectfully urge this Court to stay and administratively close this case pending exhaustion of unexhausted claims in state court without entry of judgment. Counsel further request that Randle be permitted to reopen this case, under the same case number and before the same magistrate, following exhaustion of his claims in state court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Randle v. Crawford
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.