Crawford v. Clarke’s Empirical Analysis
578 F.3d 39 · 2009
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3626 (§ 20409 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997 (Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000C
Relies on Aybar v. Crispin-Reyes · Baranowski v. Hart · Vasapolli v. Rostoff · Chamorro v. Puerto Rican Cars, Inc. · Spratt v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whenever Plaintiffs are housed in the Special Management Unit, Defendant shall provide access to a closed circuit television set that displays, through sound and images, a live broadcast of such communal Jum’ah services as are regularly held on each and every Friday for the duration of their incarceration (absent a legitimate emergency or the unavailability of an authorized Imam, in which case Defendant may broadcast prerecorded Jum’ah services).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“ban on participation [special management unit] inmates by closed-circuit television is not the least restrictive means of vindicating the compelling interest at issue”). However, Magistrate Judge Peebles is correct that Hudson is distinguishable as”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Walker v. Artus
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.