Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 1987
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Burgett v. Texas · Thigpen v. State · Baeza v. State · State v. Frazier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he identity of the name of the defendant and that of the person previously convicted is sufficient as prima facie evidence of identity of person unless the name is so common as to negate the prima facie identification, (emphasis added) Brown v. State, 578 P.2d 364, 366 (Okl.Cr.1978).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.