Capuzzo v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 527 So. 2d 1380 - Florida Bar v. Mullins · Golden v. Newsome · 506 So. 2d 50 - Quarterman v. State · 114 Ill. App. 3d 984 - People v. Castro · 284 So. 2d 415 - Manchester Insurance & Indemnity Co. v. Dunkley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(b) Defendant Absenting Himself. If the defendant is present at the beginning of the trial and shall thereafter, during the progress of said trial or before the verdict of the jury shall have been returned into court, voluntarily absent himself from the presence of the court without leave of court, or is removed from the presence of the court because of his disruptive conduct during the trial, the trial of the cause or the return of the verdict of the jury in the case shall not thereby be postponed or delayed, but the trial, the submission of said case to the jury for verdict, and the return of the verdict thereon shall proceed in all respects as though the defendant were present in court at all times.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“sentencing is a critical stage of the prosecution, it is no more critical than the trial stage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“at the pronouncement of judgment and the imposition of sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Aguiar v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.