Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

578 So. 2d 395

Docket No. 90-1113.

Mann v. Mann

Joel B. MANN, Appellant, v. Sylvia (Sallie) MANN, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1991-04-16

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1994

3 state decisions

Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 360 So. 2d 1244 - Miles v. State · 346 So. 2d 56 - Herzog v. Herzog

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1991-04-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*396 Bluestein & Wayne, and Greene & Marks, and Cynthia L. Greene, Miami, for appellant.

¶2Sinclair, Louis, Siegel, Heath, Nussbaum & Zavertnik, and Paul Siegel, Miami, for appellee.

¶3Before FERGUSON, JORGENSON and GERSTEN, JJ.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Appellant, Joel B. Mann, appeals from a final judgment in a dissolution of marriage. We affirm.

¶6Appellant contends that the trial court erred in the equitable distribution of the parties' assets. The record in the case contains conflicting evidence regarding the valuation of the assets. The trial court, having heard the evidence, is in a better position to determine the credibility of the witnesses. Accordingly, the trial court's findings are presumed correct. Marsh v. Marsh, 419 So.2d 629 (Fla. 1982); Storer v. Storer, 353 So.2d 152 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); cert. denied, 360 So.2d 1250 (Fla. 1978); Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla. 1977); see also Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980).

¶7Affirmed.

/578/so2d/395 · .json · Public domain