Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 578 SO2D 766 - Cave v. State

Cave v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 1994
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Missouri v. Hunter · 515 So. 2d 161 - Carawan v. State · 547 So. 2d 613 - State v. Smith · 504 So. 2d 392 - Williams v. State · Forney v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Does the temporal proximity of crimes alone provide a valid reason for departure from the sentencing guidelines without a finding of a persistent pattern of criminal conduct?”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Since a robbery may, but does not necessarily include an aggravated battery, the statutory offense of `robbery' does not `subsume' the crime of aggravated battery.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.