Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 578 SW2D 78 - Moore v. State

Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently September 2016

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

4019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Coleman v. Alabama · McKeldin v. State · Waugh v. State · State v. D'ANNA · Vaughn v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If the defendant is indicted during the period of time in which his preliminary hearing is being continued, or at any time before accused has been afforded a preliminary hearing on a warrant, whether at his own request or that of the prosecutor, he may dismiss the indictment upon motion to the court. Provided, however, that no such Motion to Dismiss shall be granted after the expiration of thirty days from the date of defendant’s arrest.” (emphasis added).”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he thirty-day limitation ... is applicable only when all parties — including the defendant, who must act promptly— have acted in good faith and in compliance with the statute. The failure of the court or the prosecution to exercise good faith and to abide the law operates to toll the statute and preclude its invocation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““It is settled law in this jurisdiction that while a preliminary hearing is not constitutionally required, it is a critical stage of a criminal prosecution mandated by statutory law, and is an adversary proceeding at which the usual rules of evidence- apply. Coleman v. Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 , 90 S.Ct. 1999 , 26 L.Ed. 387 (1970); Waugh v. State, 564 S.W.2d 654 (Tenn.1978); McKeldin v. S.W.2d 82 (Tenn.1974).” State, 516”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.