Johnson v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis
578 U.S. 605 · 2016
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Coleman v. Thompson · Harrington v. Richter · McNeill v. United States · Harrington v. Richter · Lambrix v. Singletary
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Federal habeas courts generally refuse to hear claims 'defaulted ... in state court pursuant to an independent and adequate state procedural rule.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Pavatt v. Carpenter“State [procedural] rules count as 'adequate' if they are 'firmly established and regularly followed.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Pavatt v. Carpenter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.