Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 579 A2D 695 - Leeper v. United States

Leeper v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 2016

19 state decisions

90199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Smith v. Phillips · Remmer v. United States · California v. ARC America Corp. · Cabrera-Martinez v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Although Leeper’s jury had ‘retired’ after the judge had delivered his instructions, in the sense that the jurors had gone to the jury room, it had not done so ‘to consider its verdict.’ This is evident from the undisputed fact that the deputy clerk left the door open and instructed the jurors ‘not to do anything.’ Nothing in the record suggests that the jury ignored this direction, nor was there any contemporaneous claim that this had occurred or that additional prophylactic measures were appropriate.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[fallowing a proper hearing, the determination of juror bias or prejudice lies particularly within the discretion of the trial court, reversible only for a clear abuse of discretion, and the findings of fact under lying that determination are entitled to “great deference.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.