Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 579 F.2d 1282 - General Warehousemen and Helpers Local v. Standard Brands Inc General Warehousemen and Helpers Local

General Warehousemen and Helpers Local v. Standard Brands Inc General Warehousemen and Helpers Local’s Empirical Analysis

579 F.2d 1282 · 1978

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Iron Workers Local # 272 v. Bowen (1980), Miller Brewing Company v. Brewery Workers Local Union No (1984)

27 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

44019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp · Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala. · United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co. · San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The fact that the contract which was breached was due to expire April 30, 1976, is controlling as to the period for which damages may be awarded. Nothing in that contract could have created an expectation that the employees would have continued to enjoy the same wages and benefits beyond the expiration of the contract.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “jurisdiction ... over enforcement suits even thought the conduct involved was arguably or would amount to an unfair labor practice within the jurisdiction of the National Labor Relations Board.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “from the agreement and does not exceed the scope of the issues presented to the arbitrator; and (3) an award which is not”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.