Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 579 F.2d 645 - Ruth M. Sargeant v. Alexander E. Sharp, II

Ruth M. Sargeant v. Alexander E. Sharp, II’s Empirical Analysis

579 F.2d 645 · 1978

Citation profile

134
cited by 134 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
October 2010
most recently cited

75 federal appellate · 13 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 134 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2010 · most notably Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air (1987), Copeland v. Marshall (1979)

75 federal appellate · 13 district · 14 state decisions

99019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc. · Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc. · Hall v. Cole · City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell Corporation · Lindy Bros. Builders, Inc. of Phila. v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 134 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] prevailing plaintiff should ordinarily recover an attorney's fee unless special circumstances would render such an award unjust.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A] fee agreement is irrelevant to the issue of entitlement and should not enter into the determination of the amount of a reasonable fee.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “has broad discretion to make the initial determination of whether to allow an award of fees”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.