Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 579 F.2d 86 - In re Oelrich

In re Oelrich’s Empirical Analysis

579 F.2d 86 · 1978

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
May 2016
most recently cited

1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2016

1 district ·

9019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 103

Relies on Graham v. John Deere Company of Kansas City Calmar Inc · In re Pearson · In re Wiggins · In re Palmer · In re Lemin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. A time modulated fluid actuated control apparatus comprising: housing means, said housing means defining a cylinder; actuator piston means disposed in said housing means cylinder, said piston means including an output member adapted to be connected to a movable load, said load and control apparatus defining a system having a range of resonant frequencies; solenoid operated valve means mounted on said housing means, said valve means being selectively operable to deliver pressurized fluid to and to vent fluid from said housing means cylinder at one side of said piston means; means for generating variable input command signals commensurate with the desired position of the load, said command signals being characterized by a dynamic frequency range below said range of said resonant frequencies; means for generating a signal at a carrier frequency, said carrier frequency being greater than the maximum dynamic command signal frequency and less than the minimum system resonant frequency; means for modulating said carrier frequency signal by said command signals; and means responsive to said modulated carrier frequency signal for controlling energization of said solenoid operated valve means.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.