Prakash v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
579 F.3d 1033 · 2009
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 16 · 18 U.S.C. § 373 · 21 U.S.C. § 801 (§ 101 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on United States of America v. Javier Rivera-Sanchez Jose Sanchez · 36 Cal. 4th 309 - People v. Wilson · Coronado-Durazo v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · United States v. Narvaez-Gomez · Vizcarra-Ayala v. Mukasey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Crime of violence" means any of the following offenses under federal, state, or local law: murder, manslaughter, kidnapping, aggravated assault, forcible sex offenses (including where consent to the conduct is not given or is not legally valid, such as where consent to the conduct is involuntary, incompetent, or coerced), statutory rape, sexual abuse of a minor, robbery, arson, extortion, extortionate extension of credit, burglary of a dwelling, or any other offense under federal, state, or local law that has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“does not itself contain a provision listing some inchoate crimes, such as attempt and conspiracy, to the exclusion of others. The legal principle that led to the results in these controlled substances cases does not apply here.”). 15 . United States v. Shumate, 329 F.3d 1026 , 1030-31 (9th Cir.2003). 16 . 74 F.3d 189 , 190 (9th Cir.1996). 17 . The guidelines read: (a) The term”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“statute that concerns us in this case, 18 U.S.C. § 16 (b),”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.