Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 579 FAPPX 18 - Mitchell v. Garrison Protective Services, Inc.

Mitchell v. Garrison Protective Services, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
April 2016
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Connors v. Connecticut General Life Insurance · Grace v. Bank Leumi Trust Co. · ABKCO Industries, Inc. v. Apple Films, Inc. · Marshak v. Green · 131 F. Supp. 2d 495 - Missigman v. USI Northeast, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(b) Property not in the possession of judgment debtor. Upon a special proceeding commenced by the judgment creditor, 'against a person in possession or custody of money or other personal property in which the judgment debtor has an interest, or against a person who is a transferee of money or other personal property from the judgment debtor, where it is shown that the judgment debtor is entitled to the possession of such property or that the judgment creditor’s rights to the property are superi- or to those of the transferee, the court shall require such person to pay the. money, or so much of it as is sufficient to satisfy the judgment, to the judgment creditor and, if the amount to be so paid is insufficient; to. satisfy the judgment, to deliver any other personal property, or so much of it as is of sufficient value to satisfy the judgment, to a designated sheriff. Costs of the proceeding shall not be awarded against a person who did not dispute the judgment debtor's interest or right to possession. Notice of the proceeding shall also be served upon the judgment debtor in the same manner as a summons or by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. The court may permit the judgment debtor to intervene in the proceeding. The court may permit any adverse claimant to intervene in the proceeding and may determine his rights in accordance with section 5239,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.