Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

579 F. App'x 992

Brickey v. Amazon.Com

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 7, 2014

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2014-10-07

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 28 U.S.C. § 1631

Decided 2014-10-07

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Upon review of the docket, we determine that this appeal must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

¶3The case in the district court involves claims, inter alia, of copyright infringement. It does not involve claims of patent infringement. This court is a court of limited jurisdiction, which does not include jurisdiction over this appeal. 28 U.S.C. § 1295.

¶4Although we may transfer an appeal to a court that would have jurisdiction if an appeal could have been brought in that other court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631, we note that the district court has not yet entered a final judgment in the case. Thus, transfer to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is not appropriate here because the appeal could not “have been brought at the time it was filed.” 28 U.S.C. § 1631.

¶5*993Accordingly,

¶6It Is ORdered That:

¶7This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

/579/fappx/992 · .json · Public domain