Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 579 FSUPP2D 188 - Johnson v. Spellings

Johnson v. Spellings’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
March 2015
most recently cited

2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 29 U.S.C. § 791

Relies on Mathis v. New York Life Insurance · Harris v. Cuyler · John E. Dawson v. M.C. Lennon, Warden · Thompson v. Carlson · Romesburg v. Trickey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “underestimate[d] her assets by more than $562,000.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.