Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 579 NW2D 17 - In re C.V.

In re C.V.’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2013

8 state decisions

50199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Santosky v. Kramer · Baker v. Carr · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Arizona v. Fulminante · William Marbury v. James Madison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[o]n rare occasions, this Court has applied harmless error analysis to the adjudicatory phase to affirm the termination of parental rights despite errors occurring below. The question is `if reversing for an adjudicatory hearing will truly produce any rational possibility of a different result.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In re R.P., 498 N.W.2d 364, 368 (S.D.1993). It is axiomatic that Mother cannot stipulate away Father's rights. Upon what basis then does the majority reach its conclusion? Mother's stipulation and Father's incarceration! Based on those two factors, the majority states, an adjudicatory hearing would”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “Santosky, 455 U.S. at 754 n. 7, 102 S.Ct. at 1395 n. 7, 71 L.Ed.2d at 606 -07 n. 7 (emphasis in original); see also SDCL 26-7A-56 (discussing procedure for adjudicatory hearings and providing that the court should determine”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.